Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 21:02:27 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4) with ESMTP id 1627131 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:53:15 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GZ6UGQ0D.R0L for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:53:14 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: soundproofing X-Original-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 05:52:31 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal <> When I was in a spending spree picking options for my kit I, of course, bought the noise kit. When I unloaded it I had the same reaction - incredibly heavy. Just something to consider - a suggestion from my noise expert friend - rap on the surfaces you are concerned about and listen for the tone and persistence. That gives you a good idea about whether that surface will resonate at the frequencies of concern. A dull thump that instantly dissipates is good; a ringing sound that lasts is bad. Often a high-density absorber right at the center of the panel is the most effective. This doesn't relate to absorption, but will indicate the degree of transmissibility. 100 to 200 Hz seems to be the biggest area of concern (As I recall, middle C on the piano is something like 260 Hz, so that is a frame of reference). It is a good idea to perform this test on just about everything you bolt into the plane as you don't want the primary excitation from the engine to drive something into resonance. Gary Casey ES project - nothing resonates so far...