Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 17:17:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4) with ESMTP id 1602221 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:15:17 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GYS4XF0D.U0D for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:15:15 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: trim motor failure X-Original-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 07:14:39 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> A while back I received a "design" bulletin from Lancair recommending the installation of a friction device in the trim system. This would presumably add enough friction to prevent trim tab flutter if the trim mechanism broke. I haven't taken it too seriously yet as I feel that their recommended implementation left something to be desired and I haven't yet figured out a better way. Sounds like it would have prevented the problem above (not the failure, but the flutter afterward). Has anybody installed one of these devices? Any opinions on whether they are justified? Gary Casey ES project, building custom gear leg fairings at the moment