Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:00:31 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from siaar2ab.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.138] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4) with ESMTP id 1540072 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 22:29:18 -0400 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by siaar2ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.12) id WAA02851 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 22:29:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 22:27:53 -0400 From: James Frantz Subject: [LML] Re: stall/spin testing X-Original-Sender: James Frantz X-Original-To: "INTERNET:lml@lancaironline.net" X-Original-Message-ID: <200206302228_MC3-1-49B-95EA@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Message text written by INTERNET:lml@lancaironline.net >To me, when you sign off your Lancair after the test phase 25 or 40 hours as (to paraphrase) "fully tested", it ought to have been.<= I refer you to Advisory Circular AC-90-89 page 5-9, the Amateur-Built Aircraft Flight Testing Handbook. Quote: Caution #1 -- If the manufacturer/designer of your aircraft has not demonstrated satisfactory spin characteristics and safe recovery, avoid a= ll types of high angle of attack flight testing and placard the aircraft: "spins prohibited." BTW, you are signing off the aircraft as "adequately tested" not "fully tested." See AC 90-87. Also please note the E-mail subject "stall/spin testing". Of course you test for falps down slow flight handling, Vx, Vy= , best glide, etc. I'm not trying to be cute about this. I just don't like the thought of a= ny one of our community being misled by suggestions that we must do flight testing that simply isn't required and in some instances may not be safe.= James B. Frantz Proprietary Software Systems, Inc. = www.angle-of-attack.com LFrantz@compuserve.com (952) 474-4154