Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.38]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 20 Dec 1998 00:48:52 -0500 Received: from ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com ([12.73.163.66]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.05 118 121 101) with SMTP id <19981220055007.BMPQ7510@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> for ; Sun, 20 Dec 1998 05:50:07 +0000 Message-ID: <001a01be2bcb$663a3a00$42a3490c@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> Reply-To: "Curtis Krouse" From: "Curtis Krouse" To: Subject: Re: Service Ceiling Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 21:46:57 -0600 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Lorn, Thank you very much. With that kind of performance, it may definitely be worth the nearly 8K of savings for an O-320 vs IO-320. For the rest of the list, I'm still wondering about fuel injection though. With the kind of performance Lorn is talking about, I'm wondering what advantages there are with fuel injection with respect to service ceiling. I know what the advantage is in surface based vehicles, but I'm not too clear what the advantages are in aircraft. Does it increase performance and efficiency? Does it reduce the rate of fuel consumption? Does it require more maintenance? Does it have an effect on rate of climb? Thanks, Curtis N753K