Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:48:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.102] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2) with ESMTP id 1294978 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:00:54 -0400 Received: from StarAerospace@aol.com by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id q.d5.18f46a36 (4412) for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:00:48 -0400 (EDT) From: StarAerospace@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:00:47 EDT Subject: Re: Stalls, Spins and other Whirlygigs X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 124 So, yet another design and/or accessory question: Is it a good idea to install roll spoilers and/or rudder to aileron bungees to provide a significant "ball centering" force sans good pedal practices? Obviously, this makes cross controlling slips and skids harder but based on watching many sub-100 hr/year pilots flying high performance aircraft (like the IV...) I have to ask if artificial ball centering would be better than the alternative we use now. I fly coordinated whether it's in a 152 or a MiG 15 because that's what I was taught to do. But it's not instinctive, and I sure would like something to make it so regardless of type. If we go for a mechanism that creates "feet on the floor" coordinated flight, yes, we have sacrificed a fundamental principle of good airmanship. However, we would also pre-empt many stall-with-yaw departures. Would this be a good trade for most pilots? Please disqualify personal opinions and be objective if you are a CFI or 1000+ hr commercial type here; this is a question about what would be best for us lesser mortals. Eric Ahlstrom