Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:38:41 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1292247@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <jerry@mc.net>
Received: from mail.mc.net ([209.172.128.4] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2)
  with SMTP id 1292180 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:41:41 -0400
Received: (qmail 18877 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2002 14:41:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO e3q2i4) (209.112.92.248)
  by mail.mc.net with SMTP; 13 Jun 2002 14:41:45 -0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <009f01c212e8$7cd45cc0$535c70d1@e3q2i4>
From: "Jerry" <jerry@mc.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1292134@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 Stall Speed/Buffet Speed
X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:42:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Spam-Rating: mail.mc.net 1.6.1.petek 0/1000/N

Greg .... and anyone else
Can you expand the explanation about your "long winged LNC2?

Would you recommend the extended wing tips?
Are they bonded on or screwed on?
What are the upside issues?  The downside issues?
Any regrets? Would you do the extensions again?
How do they affect the long range cruise, speeds, fuel burn?
I would think they would be better ON for long hauls and better Off for
local flying fun.
Are they worth the extra dollars to purchase?
It sounds more docile in stall ... why is that?
Is 55MPH the stall speed or is that a typo ... 55Kts maybe?

Thanks
Jerry Grimmonpré   LNC2