Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:38:41 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1292250@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <DAP@DParsons.com>
Received: from echo.voice.rackshack.net ([216.40.198.12] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2)
  with ESMTP id 1292208 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:08:38 -0400
Received: from fsc (user138.sarofim.com [208.255.59.138])
	by echo.voice.rackshack.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g5DFK9Q10049
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:20:09 -0500
Reply-To: <DAP@DParsons.com>
From: "Don Parsons" <DAP@DParsons.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: What would you think of... (New AeroDiesel Engines?)
X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:10:34 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <NFBBJEBNCMJEBKBPBJPCAEBBDBAA.DAP@DParsons.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <list-1291477@logan.com>

I have been watching what is going on with the AeroDiesel engines. If they
are available when I need my engine, and they look like a good competitive
solution, I would very seriously consider one. I like the idea of using Jet
A over 100LL given the 100LL future we keeping hearing about.

Don Parsons
Super ES (ES-166-FB, N198TD Reserved)
Houston, TX