Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 16:14:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1245118 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 May 2002 15:24:58 -0400 Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 22 May 2002 15:19:59 -0400 Received: from sdn-ap-010watacop0086.dialsprint.net ([65.176.96.86] helo=f3g6s4) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17AbjF-0004Sf-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Wed, 22 May 2002 12:24:58 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <004201c201c7$0f2fb660$5660b041@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: [LML] Re: LNC2/LEG2 Gear Electraulics! X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:29:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Larry Henney writes: **That makes good sense. Are there any concerns about running the high amperage through the main relay? I thought the Lancair original design was avoiding this for some reason, no?** No. And shouldn't be much of a problem since the starter current goes through the master relay and that's much higher current. I have an early 235 and the design calls for all loads to go through the master (except for the clock, which has it's own fuse). Dan Schaefer