Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 21:23:10 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 320,360,360 MKII X-Original-To: Sky2high@aol.com X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b1 X-Original-Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 21:22:05 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5a.af48b11.2a048eff@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Sky2high@aol.com: > Posted for "Tom Niederhelman" : > Would someone educate me as to the differences between these aircraft? They are all 320's with different enhancements: 360- Use lycoming 360 instead of lycoming 320 360-MKII - built with larger tail as required by Aussies for better horizontal stability. However, these are not all of the differences or combinations: Long Engine Mount - extends engine forward 3-inches. Better match for MKII tail. OutBack Gear - Larger main wheels, different flap actuation system Header tank/no header tank Extended fuel tanks MT vs Hartzell props and weight differences Even, as I saw a few weeks ago, a 235 body (slightly smaller than 320), a 320 engine, a MKII tail, Outback gear and no header! The differences are more than skin deep. Scott Krueger N92EX