Re: Aerosance  

Aerosance has yet to prove its long term viability.  Prism's approach seems
to be the most promising since "autogas" varies from place to place.  The
midwest likes to add ethanol (10%) and certain cities (Chicago, for example)
suffers under special EPA formulations.  Something has to work effectively
with the varieties of auto gas and Prism diesn't seem to care what you are
burning as long as it can manage (hopefully max power) cylinder pressures.

The Deakin article is very frightening.  TEL supply could be lost by a random
event.  No one has considered the infrastructure cost (penalites, time) to
change lead contaminated storage facilities to hold our future carbo-hydrate
energy source.

For me, I'm stick'n to Wheaties!

Grayhawk