Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:39:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 1204595 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:28:58 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id q.129.10a68fc7 (4332) for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:28:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <129.10a68fc7.2a009ec7@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:28:39 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fw: [LML] Re: Fuel Grade List X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10500 Re: Aerosance Aerosance has yet to prove its long term viability. Prism's approach seems to be the most promising since "autogas" varies from place to place. The midwest likes to add ethanol (10%) and certain cities (Chicago, for example) suffers under special EPA formulations. Something has to work effectively with the varieties of auto gas and Prism diesn't seem to care what you are burning as long as it can manage (hopefully max power) cylinder pressures. The Deakin article is very frightening. TEL supply could be lost by a random event. No one has considered the infrastructure cost (penalites, time) to change lead contaminated storage facilities to hold our future carbo-hydrate energy source. For me, I'm stick'n to Wheaties! Grayhawk