Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:25:42 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 1201520 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:44:16 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GV6GTR00.O93 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:44:15 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: engine hesitation on switching tanks X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:41:10 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> I think that is an excellent idea. I looked at the recommended location of the pump on my ES and decided mine would go under the floor boards as well. Another possible scenario, though. The cabin is maybe 5 psi higher pressure than the fuel inside the pump. What if the shaft seal leaked air into the pump, even though it is effective in keeping the fuel from leaking out. After a few minutes at altitude it has enough air in it to essentially vapor lock for a few seconds. Wouldn't it be good to put the pump in an insulated compartment forward of the firewall? I know, no room. Gary Casey ES project