Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 01:03:03 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [144.54.3.2] (HELO picker.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 1167711 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 01:01:06 -0400 Received: from [144.54.59.5] (HELO dell) by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1) with SMTP id 13683768 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 01:01:05 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <03c401c1e696$0c1748e0$053b3690@dell> From: "Rob Logan" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: alternate air inlets X-Original-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 01:01:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > I am interested to know about how much > manifold pressure is lost using a good air > filter system versus an unrestricted fresh > air system (no filters). http://rob.com/lancair/2002.04/16air.jpg this mixing box isn't "ram" because of experience with uneven fuel distribution. http://rob.com/cht/ the filter will be on the co-pilot side near the oil pan while the other side does a 360 to http://rob.com/lancair/2002.04/4top.jpg my guess is not close enough to the prop for Gary but it will be "cool" air.. :-)