Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 1160544 for rob@logan.com; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:12:47 -0400 Received: from smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.5]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 09:58:29 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GU7AZO00.04D for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 10:02:12 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" To: Subject: windmilling props Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 06:59:21 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020407061032.AAA7975@pop3.olsusa.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <> True, but a windmilling prop, while the drag of the blade itself might be less, has to generate enough power to spin the engine, which has to come from the air. I always wondered which was less drag and now it looks like we have some real data to go by - it says pull the prop control back, but don't waste time and altitude trying to get the prop to stop spinning. Best to spend your time figuring out where to land as the spinning prop probably has less drag anyway. Gary Casey ES project >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>