Return-Path: Received: from marvkaye.olsusa.com ([205.245.9.220]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP id AAA28023 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 00:51:27 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981202005149.02b9822c@olsusa.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 00:51:49 -0500 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: "Angier M. Ames" (by way of Marvin Kaye ) Subject: Re: ELT's and other stuff X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Well, I'm sitting here fondling the box full of goodies received from Lancair today. I had ordered an ACK ELT p/n E-01 for $199 from their 1998 catalog. One of the features which appealed to me was the use of Alkaline "D" cell batteries. What I found in the box instead was an ARTEX ELT-200 for which I was billed $344. And Oh by the way, this same item can be had from Aircraft Spruce for $297.50. Their response when questioned was: Angier, Vern gave me your e mail concerning the ELT. We no longer carry the Ack ELT (p/n E-01) due to poor quality. Instead we offer the ELT 200 which we feel is made much better. The price reflects that I suppose. If you do not want the ELT 200 you can return it for a full credit (to my attention please). Let me know what you would like to do and I will handle the paperwork. Thank You, Debi Baer Avionics Assistant OK, OK, is this the old bait and switch routine??? If I did this to one of my customers (without checking with them in advance), I'd have one less option for any future prostate cancer cure! Are any of you flying with the ACK Technologies ELT and are there legitimate quality concerns here? The next item in this box was their cabin heat valve p/n CHV-A. The design of this part is mysterious to say the least. With the short flange end mounted to the firewall, it seems clear which way to position the valve in order to redirect hot air from entering the cockpit. Presumably, you would want to dump this hot air overboard instead exhausting it into the engine compartment, right? What I don't understand is this. With the valve positioned to direct hot air into the cockpit, the other opening (dump opening for short) always remains OPEN. Is there a reason for this? What am I missing here? The last items received were two adjustable panel mount eyeball vents together with two plenum caps. I guess I was not expecting the openings for air into these plenum caps to be so small...5/6id, 3/4od. Are you really only supposed to connect these caps to the naca scoops via 3/4id hose? OK, this is enough rambling from me for the next several months. Do I keep the ARTEX ELT or not? Angier Ames