From: Sky2high@aol.com
Message-ID: <194.3cef869.29c3e981@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:19:13 EST
Subject: Re: Avemco not insuring Lancairs
To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
All, et al:

Avemco's failure to insure Lancair hulls-in-motion is based on their 
experience, a disparity between takeoffs and subsequent successful landings.  
However, perhaps the next inquiry should go to their promoter, the 
Experimental Aircraft Association insurance group. 

I don't fly with hull-in-motion insurance -- its a fixed loss not worth the 
increasing premiums and it (the hull, not me) won't make my estate 
substanially smaller.  I do insure for liability and "comprehensive" 
on-the-ground losses.

Scott Krueger
N92EX
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair
Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore
assist with the management of the LML.

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>