Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.6) with ESMTP id 1128407 for rob@logan.com; Thu, 07 Mar 2002 20:29:28 -0500 Received: from imo-d07.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.39]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:37:59 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id k.9e.23053ebe (16783) for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:40:50 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <9e.23053ebe.29b90021@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:40:49 EST Subject: Re: Open letter to Dave To: lancair.list@olsusa.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 3/6/2002 11:43:48 PM Mountain Standard Time, lancair.list@olsusa.com writes: << the vast majority of experimental aircraft builders and pilots prefer the innovative, riskier and lower costs associated with the experimental world. >> Hell, no, we don't! We prefer the lower costs and/or higher performance of the homebuilt arena, but if you're introducing unnecessary risk into your project you're doing something wrong. The FAA reduces risk via an expensive process of analysis and testing. Bypassing this process may or may not involve extra risk. If a part is specified to certain limits and has proven itself in another application (say, the automotive world), and the differences between the automotive environment and the airborne environment are accounted for, where's the extra risk? The structural integrity of an aircraft design should be demonstrated somehow, by analysis or test, but need not be done to FAA standards as long as it's done thoroughly. Where's the extra risk? I won't deny that there are aspects of the homebuilt market that add risk, but I don't know anyone who prefers additional risk. We manage risk, we accept some risk (probably more than the FAA allows in the certified world), but we certainly don't prefer it. - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>