Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.4) with ESMTP id 1044366 for rob@logan.com; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:48:11 -0500 Received: from scanmail1.cableone.net ([24.116.0.73]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:25:01 -0500 Received: from scanmail1.cableone.net ([24.116.0.73]) by scanmail1.cableone.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.117.11); Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:26:15 -0700 Received: from scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.73] by scanmail1.cableone.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.04) id A2977D7D00C8; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:26:15 -0700 Received: from Wendell ([24.116.194.11]) by scanmail1.cableone.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.117.11); Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:26:14 -0700 Message-ID: <003c01c1b310$95044c20$9865fea9@Wendell> From: "Wendell & Jean Durr" To: References: <20020211061322.AAA23077@pop3.olsusa.com> Subject: Re: Legacy engine choice Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:27:14 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: legacy147@cableone.net X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Are there any compelling arguments against use of a Cont. IO520 instead of a 550 in the Legacy? Assuming not, which models would most easily replace the 550N, requiring the fewest mods? Thanks in advance. Wendell Durr #147 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>