Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 848286 for rob@logan.com; Wed, 08 Aug 2001 11:09:41 -0400 Received: from mtiwmhc21.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.46]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:51:50 -0400 Received: from SilkesPoJ.cmis.abbott.com ([12.84.11.166]) by mtiwmhc21.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with SMTP id <20010808130145.DCBH12706.mtiwmhc21.worldnet.att.net@SilkesPoJ.cmis.abbott.com> for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 13:01:45 +0000 Message-ID: <001d01c12009$510ebf40$cdc8c8c8@cmis.abbott.com> From: "Bruce McEwen" To: References: <3B70285A.862.245F084D@localhost> Subject: Re: Static Dischargers Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:54:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> David: Snip--- > I am building an ES and was wondering if anyone farther along > than me (horiz stab) had any input towards static dischargers for e- > glass aircraft. Snip--- I am also building an ES and have just completed my elevators and did not install static wicks. I did a fair amount of research and a fair amount of collaboration with fellow builders regarding static wicks to see if it applied to my situation. Here is summary of what I found: Since I do not intend on turbo charging our ES and operating it at flight level altitudes, the only potential benefit I found from adding static wicks would be improved radio reception with internally mounted antennas. Based on shear number of headaches that I've heard about from fellow builders regarding internally mounted Comm antennas, I've decided that I mount mine antennas externally. I also found, that contrary to popular option, static wicks do not reduce ones chances of being struck by lightening. They do however, have the capacity of reducing the damage that one may sustain from being struck, (although not guaranteed). My conclusion was that since my piloting skills require me to respect the weather, my plane will not be flying a flight levels or flight level speeds and I'm willing to have an externally mounted antennas (like the Columbia), that I did not need to install static wicks. Just to be sure, also took this issue up with Lancair directly and they concurred with my conclusions. Lastly, since it's always good idea to get more one opinion, here are a couple of web sites I found on the subject as part of my research: http://www.tpub.com/air/2-29.htm http://www.speedbrakes.com/static1.html The second URL is a bit of sales pitch aimed directly at IV-P drivers. Happy building, Bruce McEwen & Silke Paulsen ~10% Super ES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>