Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.36]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA17564 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:36:56 -0500 Received: from default ([12.74.75.206]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with ESMTP id <19981106193711.UPAF16188@default> for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 19:37:11 +0000 Reply-To: From: "Doug Waddingham" To: "Lancair List" Subject: Brake Lines Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 12:34:52 -0700 Message-Id: <19981106193711.UPAF16188@default> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> After much thought and discussion regarding the brake lines in the 360 this is what I have decided to do. Custom made 666-4 flex hose from the brake master cylinders to a point near the intersection of the firewall and the nose wheel tunnel.At this point I intend to run 1/4" 5052 aluminum line down through the center console, along the forward face of the aft spar, through the aft endof the cockpit closeout rib and then into a bulkhead fitting in the partial rib out in the wheel well. From this bulkhead fitting I will then run 666-4 flex hose down to the brake assembly with attachment to the main landing gear leg with adel clamps Questions: Is there an obvious fault in this design that I'm overlooking?. Is 1/4" line overkill? Is a parking brake a desireable option? If so how does that affect the installation of the brake lines? Thanks for all your input and suggestions Regards, Doug