Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 846622 for rob@logan.com; Sat, 04 Aug 2001 04:14:02 -0400 Received: from imo-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.163]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 21:54:09 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.9.) id k.20.1a2f2d32 (3733) for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 22:03:45 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com Message-ID: <20.1a2f2d32.289cb201@aol.com> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 22:03:45 EDT Subject: Re: Fw: flight To: lancair.list@olsusa.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Great job getting the aircraft back on the deck after having the window blow out-- however I am amazed at the rest of the story. Just because it is experimental doesn't relieve the pilot from flying an airworthy aircraft (see FAR 91.7). Either you had one hell of a ferry permit (I would like to see a copy of it) or you just told the world how you violated several sections of the Federal Aviation Regulations. The best, and safest, course of action would have been to have the aircraft repaired before further flight. This is required by the regs. This is not the first time I have read on this post, of pilot's putting themselves and their passengers in harm's way to "get home". I recall a pilot having had his airplane hit by lightning this year and suffering rather severe damage to the rudder. He simply taped up the damaged pieces and flew home from Texas to California. A recently departed pilot flew an airplane (with an apparent known fuel problem) cross country enroute to California and only got as far as Arizona before crashing. Another pilot (also recently dead) flew an airplane that a DAR deemed unairworthy only to have it crash shortly after takeoff. Its no wonder that our insurance rates are so damned high. With "airmanship" like this we will all be "uninsurable" by the end of the year. If you don't believe me, then ask your broker why only one major insurance company will insure us and why they are having second thoughts after the recent spate of accidents. We are looked at by the insurance companies as a "group" of Lancair IVP pilots. If a few of us are determined to risk it all, then you are screwing us all. Please, if not for your own sake and the sake of your passengers-- then for the rest of us, don't fly an airplane with a problem that renders it "unairworthy". I can't afford it. Jeff Edwards LIVP 456 ATP, CFI, DPE, Aircraft Accident Investigator ">Our speed leaving Iceland over the Atlantic was slow, 165 IAS as we had >duct tape replacing the window and we had a elevator trim problem. So we >flew low and slow. When the window blew out at 22,000 feet, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>