Return-Path: Received: from marvkaye.olsusa.com ([205.245.9.252]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP id AAA10654 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 07:38:18 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981106073500.02f33ee8@olsusa.com> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 07:35:00 -0500 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: Lynda Frantz (by way of Marvin Kaye ) Subject: Nylaflow tubing for brakes X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> There have been many incidents of runway excursions or near excursions which were the result of Nylaflow failures. Several of these have been documented in the Lancair Network News. Glasairs have also had many problems with the Nylaflow tubing resulting in a SB several years ago. I'm also aware of folks who state no problems with the tubing but I think they have just been lucky. Keep in mind that there is no nose wheel steering on our craft. If one brake is inop the other is unusable due to the lack of nose wheel steering. Therefore, if one brake fails and the runway is short you have only two options, exit the end or exit the side. 100% brake reliability is imperative. Nylaflow has apparently been failing due to fatigue at bends and failing in areas of high temps like near the brake disks. One LNN article even documented brittle tubing up inside the weel well area. I used pressure tubing that is constructed of #3 AL hard lines and #3 SS teflon braided hose where flexing is required. AL lines and aircraft quality flex lines cost more than Nylaflow but is cheap insurance in my opinion. Jim Frantz Lancair Network News