Return-Path: Received: from camel8.mindspring.com ([207.69.200.58]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA247 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 22:41:00 -0500 Received: from Pmlally (ip163.southern-pines.nc.pub-ip.psi.net [38.30.55.163]) by camel8.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA15788 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 22:41:13 -0500 (EST) From: marklisalally@mindspring.com Message-ID: <000201be07a4$be4b7600$a3371e26@Pmlally> To: "lanciar list" Subject: lancair ES stall speed Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 22:30:21 -0500 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> This is my first submission to the builder forum, I have had a lot to say but I have never wanted to go through the trouble of figuring out how to make a post, but I learned something last night that may jeopardize my ultimate plans for my airplane. First a little history. I am a very low time pilot (65 hours sense day one) and the reason I got my ticket was so I could build and fly my own plane. I spent 6 months researching a suitable aircraft. My priorities were #1 slow stall speed #2 utility #3 reasonably fast cruise speed. The Lancair ES seemed to be exactly what I wanted, Even beyond my lofty goals. In doing research on the.. ES , I read many articles in many publication and also conversed with the factory. All the information consistently claimed the stall speed, flaps deployed at 57 mph or 50 knots. Well, with this info I did the standard math (Vso x 1.3= standard short final approach speed or 65 knots) which seemed reasonable for my planed 1700ft turf runway. So I started my big plans. I spent six months building a 1512 sq ft hanger-workshop behind my house, I spent 4 months constructing a 1700x150ft grass runway , and the last year building my plane. Right now I am about 2 to months from closing my wings. This is where the problems begins. I received my ES POH in the mail last night and began to read it. To my SHOCK the Vso was stated at 61 knots , this translates to an 80 knot approach speed. This seems to me to be excessive for a 1700ft runway. I called Carstin at lancair today to inquire on the facts. He said he believed the 50 knot figure to be correct, but went on to say that he did not fill comfortable flying below 80 knots or maybe 75 on a calm day into a short field. this leaves me to believe the 61 knot Vso figure to be correct. Now I am in search of solutions to by problem. Will speed brakes make much difference in approach angle or landing roll? Has anyone done R&D on vortec generators on an ES? I have no problem giving 5 or 10 knots up in cruise speed to lower my landing speed by the same amount. Any advise from fellow lancair people out there would be very much appreciated. mark Lally ES 10 %