Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 161898 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:07:03 -0400 Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.57]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040615140632.KMV17600.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:06:32 -0400 From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Ingnition coils Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:06:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040615140632.KMV17600.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Hi All, Giff Marr wrote: > If my memory serves me, I believe that the Northstar engine has coils that > serve two cylinders. Would this be a better weight solution then installing > 4 [13B] or 6 [20B] coils. This could be a genuinely bad idea. All such coils that I'm familiar with operate on a "waste spark" principle - i.e. the "ground" for both ends of the high voltage path is at the plug in each of the served cylinders. The pairing is such that one cylinder is at the top of the compression stroke and the other is at the top of the exhaust stroke. The only comparable condition in a rotary engine is with simultaneous firing of both plugs on the same rotor. Such an arrangement would considerably diminish the safety redundacy of the ignition system - in that if a coil fails, one completely loses the power on that rotor. Moreover, if one plug goes bad, it can diminish the quality of the spark in of the other plug on that coil - which also could have the effect result of no power from that rotor. my $.02 Dale R. COZY MkIV-R #1254