Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #8048
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Runner Length
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 22:43:10 -0700
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

 

Al, focusing on the losses at these velocities and thinking that re-accelerating the column of air in the intake tract is a bad thing misses the point entirely.  That's like saying a supercharger will drop horsepower because it takes power from the engine to turn it.

Well; I don’t think it misses the point entirely.  I was just pointing out that accelerating the air uses energy, which is a negative in addition to other losses (reducing manifold pressure).  I didn’t mean to imply that you couldn’t get it back in a greater charge – it’s just not free.

 

 And, of course we must keep in mind that inertial effect is separate from the harmonic effect.

        Here is a link to a pretty good explanation of how to select the correct intake runner length:

        http://www.hotrod.com/projectbuild/113_9907_efi/

        They say that the runner length should equal the third harmonic wavelength.
Al

>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/

>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster