Return-Path: Received: from wb1-a.mail.utexas.edu ([128.83.126.134] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP-TLS id 3207770 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 May 2004 17:24:46 -0400 Received: (qmail 45276 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 21:24:45 -0000 Received: from dhcp-191-101.per.utexas.edu (HELO benefits3.mail.utexas.edu) (146.6.191.101) by wb1.mail.utexas.edu with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 May 2004 21:24:45 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20040505161250.02360f30@localhost> X-Sender: msteitle@mail.utexas.edu@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 16:24:05 -0500 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Mark Steitle Subject: Pulley Sizing (was Coolant Pressure Gauge) In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Mike, I will measure my e-shaft pulley when I get home tonight, but I'm sure it is larger than 4.5". I wouldn't be too concerned with a 10,800 rpm's max for the alternators, but with a 5.5" (17.28" circumference) e-shaft pulley and a 2.5" (7.85" circumference) alternator pulley, the ratio is 2.2:1. So, the alternators would be turing 15,840 rpm at 7200 engine rpm. That is 58% over the 10,000 rpm figure. That what makes me nervous. Since multi-V belts have become so commonplace, I feel certain that I can find something around 4.5" that I can adapt. Guess I'll have to make a trip to Pic-A-Part and see what I can find. Mark At 02:03 PM 5/5/2004 -0700, you wrote: >The alternator speed isn't a problem, it doesn't care how fast you spin it >(unless you have an alternator that is way out of balance). On my RV-4 >with Lycoming engine the alternator is over-driven about 4:1, I have the >2-1/2 inch stock alternator pulley, the crank/ring gear pulley is about >10" diameter so the alternator will see 10,000 at cruise. This is typical >of most Lycoming installations on experimentals and is not a problem on >thousands of planes. > >My e-shaft pulley is 4-1/2 inches dia. I think it is a stock pulley as >the timing pointer is at the edge of the pulley. That makes the >alternator over-driven at 1.8:1. Using a 6000 rpm cruise with my RD-1C >that makes the alternator spin at 10,800. Close enough. > >There are enough Lyc drivers that were uncomfortable with this that >someone makes a 4" pulley for the alternator. Aircraft Spruce 02-03 >catalog page 245, p/n 07-06828 $48.95. (A waste o' money except for the >feel good factor. If you'll accept MY explanation I'll accept your 48.95 >and SAVE YOU shipping costs! >P-) > >Regarding water pump speed, I've been working on this for a few weeks with >my 13B dynafocal adaptor. I've mostly come to the conclusion (yet open to >more data or ideas) that the factory pump and pulley are sized to provide >the needed flow capacity at any given engine speed at the horsepower >levels we are running at. So, to make it easy I'm sticking with the stock >pump at the stock pulley ratio. > >Mike >Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR >13B in gestation mode, RD-1C, EC-2 > >At 12:06 2004-05-05, you wrote: >>Well, that's interesting. This reminds me of a nagging question I have >>had, but haven't asked. >> >>I was curious about the need to go to a smaller crank pulley to slow down >>the water pump and alternators. >> From memory, the crank pulley is about 5-1/2", the alternator pulleys >> are about 2-1/2", and the water pump >>pulley is about 4" diameter. >> >>So, running an RD-2C (2.85 ratio), the alternators will be turning about >>20k during climb-out and the wp will be turning >>about 10K rpm. That seems too fast to me. I could probably find larger >>pulleys for the alternators, but >>then there's the water pump pulley. Your unplanned experiment would >>suggest that we can run the wp slower >>and still cool adequately. >> >>This brings me to a second option. I think a simpler approach would be >>to reduce the size of the crank pulley. >>The problem is that I haven't found a multi-V reducing pulley at any of >>the after-market suppliers. I really don't >>want to change over all the multi-V pulleys to single V pulleys, but that >>is one option. >> >>Another solution might be to find a smaller pulley from another vehicle >>and adapt it to fit the rotary. If that doesn't >>work, I could have one made. >> >>So, am I worrying about nothing, or is this a real problem? >> >>Mark > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html