Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:14:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d10.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.42] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1740735 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 01:18:36 -0400 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.11.) id q.19b.917fe06 (4222) for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 01:18:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehanover@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <19b.917fe06.2abd5b0b@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 01:18:03 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary]Enlarging Trailing spark plug holes X-Original-To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 9/19/2002 7:35:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,=20 fly.ez@verizon.net writes: > Without enlarging the trailing hole there will likely not be enough > power to land the vehicle safely. We are troubled with the idea of > someone using dual ignition on the leading plugs only. If a spark plug > fouls then there is no TRUE dual ignition. > =20 > Thank you > Dennis Hayes > Owner =E2=80=93 Hayes Rotary Engineering > =20 Well I'll be darned. If you can do it then you can do it. Now for the=20 other shoe to =20 fall............Can I make more power with this modification? How much=20 more=20 power?=20 Lynn E. Hanover=20