Return-Path: <cowcam@pipcom.com>
Received: from smtp.pipcom.com ([204.92.62.10] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 3190075 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:56:20 -0400
Received: (qmail 30976 invoked by uid 107); 25 Apr 2004 20:56:14 -0000
Received: from cowcam@pipcom.com by orthanc by uid 64011 with qmail-scanner-1.20 
 (clamscan: 0.60.  Clear:RC:1(204.92.62.164):. 
 Processed in 3.25564 secs); 25 Apr 2004 20:56:15 -0000
Received: from ras3-32.pipcom.com (HELO new) (204.92.62.164)
  by orthanc.pipcom.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2004 20:56:02 -0000
Message-ID: <005a01c42b07$966b5b00$6701a8c0@new>
From: "Peter Cowan/Lexy Cameron" <cowcam@pipcom.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-3189931@logan.com>
Subject:  2.85 redrive
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:53:58 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Wills wrote:
> >
>the Ross
> > 2.85:1. He claims that box uses better gears, and the guys
that Ive heard
> > of who have used it certainly havent had the problems that
Ive heard of
> > with the 2.17:1 box.
> >  Obviously there is more potential horsepower available at
these higher

This would seem to be the right moment to remind people that I
STILL have a pristine, new, Ross  2.85 drive for sale at a
bargain price (or you could talk me out of a slightly used 2.85
instead). Talk to me people.
Peterc at pipcom dot com.