I like your fabrication skills and think the work looks great, That said I have to ask, if you are going to run plugs up, (which is often a good solution in various aircraft), why not go dry sump? If you are going to fabricate a side sump you obviously have the skills to select and install a dry sump. The nice thing about it is there are many good pumps out there available over the counter. Mazda even had kits for it for the racing guys, until all the racing organizations banned the rotary because it was an awesome powerplant.  There are even several advantages to dry sump. There are many tanks available. LaRoux you might not want to go dry sump now since you have already done a lot of planning and fabrication for your current set up. But it would be a good idea to get everybody talking about it again. The Superlite engine designed and built by the original PowerSport was both a plugs up engine and dry sump. they even went to the trouble of making one version that ran backward! This was to get a "correct" prop rotation when running a planetary gear reduction. some of the ex rotary racers can likely tell you where and how many of the dry sump pickups they ran. (How about it Lynn?)  The advantage of a separate tank for oil prevents any uncovering of the oil pickup it is just in the bottom of the tank. There are more lines to plumb and you need a drive pulley for the eshaft but even those can be purchased and adapted from the piston guys. FWIW.

I have modeled the cooling setup used to excellent effect by the Powersport guys. Since even a conventional rotary engine is lighter than a lyc PS made slightly extended motormounts and ran the configuration shown with great results. Note there are 3 heat exchangers all the same size. Perfect for the rotary since about a third of the cooling is done through the oil. The heat exchangers modeled are 18x18x2" which gives you 648 sq/in of water cooling area or 1296 cu/in if you prefer, and 324 sq/in oil cooling area or 648 cu/in. The inlets can be conventional and they also tried an annular opening which worked fine flying. Conventional inlets did better on the ground though. I just put this together so people could have a view of a configuration that worked well. H2O Radiators were run in both parallel and series. both work  but if you run parallel you need to balance the flow. Both worked okay.  (due to message size limit I'm sending the picture separately)

Bill Jepson