X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=NYOYKFL4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GXSWpCAE9/1CVrxg8/o4vw==:117 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=oSMvVwY2MYMA:10 a=sTwFKg_x9MkA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=fsZA_LkJDVY8jRP8kgoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=xajjMfhrbOtJvJdiP90A:9 a=5m6bDRcg6o_iFOW8:21 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 From: "David Leonard wdleonard@gmail.com" Received: from mail-qk1-f175.google.com ([209.85.222.175] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.14) with ESMTPS id 220518 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 08 May 2020 09:17:29 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.222.175; envelope-from=wdleonard@gmail.com Received: by mail-qk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id c10so1448174qka.4 for ; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:17:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ntYsf3qAalJ116jSnIvfGbh/W0czEvd58I3xw3gkQyU=; b=WowzZzgLShIiaVTE4fneGcIIubEFVLFvJoKSmOhssvYCXLzchI6KEzd15viNcGUl1t kXg5vWpBbB9atuOdA/r/ev/e67f9fJuL7iU+e+0V+4jBomurCrFBLYFCnTVTKAFNLNZh 08yV5J7Q2RkM3d1Ly5135y2H2RltgNLrHtc/1E5aNFjcpUTkmKVxC9y82hAMdQ1gVswi DQP59IJ2HWaBeMhd/JikfmPdKHL+mRIyzig9vJUSfYlM0ptuFue7nzSSDqmU7JJYF0cd lLeihlbNvKFTqKkhF9Bpe2KVl1kEejGeIIfNdMmUUc35dFJPPjKOcgKRrp3uHpx52M/h /t8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ntYsf3qAalJ116jSnIvfGbh/W0czEvd58I3xw3gkQyU=; b=hrKlwRFyz4cu33APNU4LzMSxz8ge2jPAPLEgwipg+y806YG3bnCrZr5XCrGi9dDPUK uq4IC8oBfKlGmyWGmhSDK8gWCF2fqCZhMn2+xsO4vlSUt59LL8na5786adW+BJ/u9sgp ViZjbfvasr6U4xofsXgIyQB3OJt2nya5jlIt7sliNybVHMgczc6y060QAVPbnYE8T219 M8xGwsla125aHQiHhm5i6b5H/x0JvUgtoFP09Pg8to0WmQP6avPfTKhHZiopYvJRzsWc s4SKqZR8OXsvyoZpZoGilpdYi1eQt/zXMxAySRDYsJd5k1cbLC4xkXid0xR1RQqpNSuP 3BFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYvLOlBzzY1jfMVl52V4SqaIbYhxhLMglrWsPQ73nkjexG+7ZFQ MfnW5OAn/GTu1rxdzDCYD7keZfp2Lhrt1fIelN2i3tOd X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJz5jgUlVWH7eR2flA+lhoySrl/wvJuvFREgTZt7FVVho1/J1vse8tTRsrhldHZFSz77cdgffti47AlgygEv0Y= X-Received: by 2002:a37:414a:: with SMTP id o71mr2801072qka.141.1588943832162; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:17:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 06:17:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Turbos To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af244c05a522d001" --000000000000af244c05a522d001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Neil, It all depends on how you size and operate your turbo. In general, the pressure relief, or pop-off valve is not needed in aircraft. Those come more into play during the fast throttle closures that occur in highly boosted race cars during shifting. They spend almost all of their time closed. These valves are not intended to be the primary pressure regulation and would not function well in such a capacity. They only limit peak pressure but do not do so with a high level of accuracy or control ability. They would also be highly inefficient if used in this manner, as the turbo would be producing continuously higher back pressure than needed. The turbo would be short lived and your fuel consumption would suffer greatly. The wastegate issue is a much bigger question but the short answer is that yes, you probably want/need one. The only exception might be a large turbine turbo that is sized so big that the max boost was only achieved at WOT operating conditions. Even then, you would be limiting the usefulness of your turbo at altitude because if it were sized for WOT at sea level, it would not be very useful at altitude. If sized for WOT at altitude you could use throttle to control boost down low, but you always run the risk of overboost. Similarly, a fixed exhaust bypass would allow a smaller turbo to be used in the same manner but with less efficiency and shorter life. I have experimented with my turbo in this configuration. By removing the flapper valve from my wastegate and creating a fixed bypass I was able to run at WOT and have approximately the boost I wanted, but only at a very specific altitude. Any higher and boost drops off precepitously. Any lower and throttle is needed to control boost. There is not much of a sweet spot as the natural variations in conditions created a oscillating situation that is simply not tolerable. But for maximum benefit from your turbo, longest life and efficiency there is no substitute for a wastegate of some sort. Dave Leonard N4VY, Turbo Rotary RV-6 On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:47 PM 12348ung@gmail.com < flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote: > Can anyone help me with the following? With a turbo, can I just use a > pressure relief valve and negate the wastegate totally?? Looking for > simplicity and weight saving. Neil. > --000000000000af244c05a522d001 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Neil,
It all depends on how you size and operate yo= ur turbo.
In general, the pressure relief, or pop-off valve is not = needed in aircraft.=C2=A0 Those come more into play during the fast throttl= e closures that occur in highly boosted race cars during shifting.=C2=A0 Th= ey spend almost all of their time closed.=C2=A0 These valves are not intend= ed to be the primary pressure regulation and would not function well in suc= h a capacity. They only limit peak pressure but do not do so with a high le= vel of accuracy or control ability.=C2=A0 They would also be highly ineffic= ient if used in this manner, as the turbo would be producing continuously= =C2=A0higher back pressure than needed.=C2=A0 The turbo would be short live= d and your fuel consumption would suffer greatly.

The wastegate issue is a much bigger question but the short answer is= that yes, you probably want/need one.=C2=A0 The only exception might be a = large turbine turbo that is sized so big that the max boost was only achiev= ed at WOT operating conditions.=C2=A0 Even then, you would be limiting the = usefulness of your turbo at altitude because if it were sized for WOT at se= a level, it would not be very useful at altitude.=C2=A0 If sized for WOT at= altitude you could use throttle to control boost down low, but you always = run the risk of overboost.=C2=A0 Similarly, a fixed exhaust bypass would al= low a smaller turbo to be used in the same manner but with less efficiency = and shorter life.=C2=A0 I have experimented with my turbo in this configura= tion.=C2=A0 By removing the flapper valve from my wastegate and creating a = fixed bypass I was able to run at WOT and have approximately the boost I wa= nted, but only at a very specific altitude.=C2=A0 Any higher and boost drop= s off precepitously.=C2=A0 Any lower and throttle is needed to control boos= t.=C2=A0 There is not much of a sweet spot as the natural variations in con= ditions created a oscillating=C2=A0situation that is simply not tolerable.= =C2=A0 But for maximum benefit from your turbo, longest life and efficiency= there is no substitute for a wastegate of some sort.

<= div>Dave Leonard
N4VY, Turbo Rotary RV-6

On Thu, May 7, 2020= at 2:47 PM 12348ung@gmail.com &l= t;flyrotary@lancaironline.ne= t> wrote:

Can anyone help me with the f= ollowing?=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 With a turbo, can I just use a pressure relief = valve and negate the wastegate totally??=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0Looking for simp= licity and weight saving.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Neil.

<= /div>
--000000000000af244c05a522d001--