Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #65301
From: Neil Unger 12348ung@gmail.com <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Update on Glasair Cooling in Phase #1
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:01:11 +1100
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Lynn,  ON a different subject,  turbos,  So many to pick from but the bullet proof ones add much weight.  Do you have an recommendation in turbos for just normalised of a little above that do not weigh  too much?  Waste gate Yes / no,  just what do you recommend?  Neil.

On 11/5/2019 5:24 PM, lehanover lehanover@aol.com wrote:
When the cold fuel air mixture gets to the rotor face (much hotter than the oil temps) it expands violently.
This slows, stops, or even reverses the incoming charge in the runner. The exact loss would depend on hundreds of items.
Velocity in the runner would be a big one. But every different setup would need to be on a dyno to pin down the numbers. Richer mixture for take off and climb will help fuel cool the charge. Once at cruise lean of peak EGT will reduce temps (and power) and give best economy. Rotaries have poor torque at any RPM so try higher RPM for takeoff until no increase in performance is seen and then back off of that a bit. My best was 13,000 RPM. The driver stuck it into first instead of third on a downshift. Had to sand the irons a bit working on the tailgate of a pickup. Made the race the next day. If it is a sound well built engine even up to 8,000 RPM for takeoff would not hurt it. Our normal shift point was 9,600 RPM. Cruise speed would be controlled by the cost of fuel. The lightest bearing loads are at about 6,000 RPM.
Make one change at a time. Make the first change big so you can see which direction the change is taking you. Then go back to the starting point and make a list of small changes in that direction. Compile data electronicly  or make movies of the dash board.

The Star Mazda people send engines back for rebuild every few weeks. They run thin oil scalding hot to reduce oil drag. They have plenty of fuel for fuel cooling. Note the sheets of fire out the exhaust. Not much to copy off of those people for airplanes. Daryl Drummond used to build every one of those engines.
A monster ignition system and standard auto fuel. Ice cold spark plugs. Redline 40 or 50 weight at 100 PSI or as close as you can get.

Just my opinions. I could be completely wrong......Lynn E. Hanover

You are flying a dyno. So a week of testing would give you a chart for best power/mixture for each situation.

In a message dated 11/4/2019 6:22:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, flyrotary@lancaironline.net writes:

Hi Bobby
Thanks, I had the same thought yesterday. Introduced a further 15 in2 of airflow to cowl.
I must get on and instrument the cowl for pressures.

Thanks Lynn.
What kind of power difference might we see between say oil of 180F and 200F
Does oil temp also effects fuel economy?
I need to do further testing at higher airs speeds and trying to understand the tradeoffs between approx power/eccon cost if we were to only get down to 200F.
I had a Starmazda paper that stated that they target 200F.

Also any feedback on how to fly the engine would be appreciated by my test pilot friend who is doing the testing.
He is trying to get a handle on what rpm, map, prop pitch settings to use for the various flight regimes.
The prop is elect variable but not auto/constant speed.

For take off we are just winding in pitch (a human governor) to keep RPM at ~7300 and 120KIAS climb.
Now I’m guessing that we’ll eventually experiment with best rpm/blade pitch/map that gives best efficiency, but before then can you guys provide any wisdom?

What RPM might you target after initial climb?

As always, really appreciate the feedback.
Cheers

Steve Izett
> On 5 Nov 2019, at 3:21 am, lehanover lehanover@aol.com <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>
> The oil temp tracks the power output. Hotter rotor means hotter oil. Not a solid connection to water temps but some. Oil temps above 160 degrees cost power.
> Lynn E. Hanover
>
> In a message dated 11/4/2019 9:28:29 AM Eastern Standard Time, flyrotary@lancaironline.net writes:
>
> Steve,
>
> If all your exchangers dump into the cowl then the increased flow / pressure through the coolant exchangers may be limiting air flow through the oil cooler.
>
> Bobby
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
> Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2019 3:42 PM
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Update on Glasair Cooling in Phase #1
>
> Sorry Matt, I just realised I hadn’t mentioned the actual oil temps.
> Highest in climb were 114C (237F) settling back to 110C this is 10C higher than previous flight?? OAT was up 4C ~7F
> I would have expected a symbiotic relationship between oil and water temps. Lower coolant yielding lower oil temps.
> This is troubling me, Prior to this flight I noticed oil level down on the stick. Its always been very consistently full  with no signs of leaks etc. (Standard Renesis pan)
> It’s running Mobile 1 and measuring the oil entering the engine after cooler and filter.
>
> Steve
>
> > On 3 Nov 2019, at 11:35 pm, Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
> >
> > Coolant looks great. Are you running a t-stat?
> > What are the oil temps when you say "high"? Synthetic? Weight? Oil pan or inlet temp location?
> >
> > This is my opinion, with synthetic 20W50 at oil pain temps, I'd be okay during the climb with 240F and hopefully after some air speed it drops down under 220F.
> >
> > I do agree you might have to open up to 100mm (4 inch) for oil cooler.
> >
> > - Matt Boiteau
> >> On 2019-11-03 8:31:47 AM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi there people
> >>
> >> Over the past month I have updated the cooling system of the Glasair Super II RG in order to continue our phase 1 testing.
> >>
> >> The previous setup had 540in3 two pass behind the ~20in2 unmodified right cheek inlet.
> >> We hadn’t included the left cheek as it was so difficult to get the air across to the right hand side diffuser.
> >> The Oil is 250in3 behind a 8in2 under spinner inlet.
> >> Initial testing was marginal with OAT below 20C (68F)
> >> So having established that cooling was rather marginal above 68F I went for the planned upgrade path which included
> >> installing a secondary bike radiator of 130in3 plumbed into the heater circuit behind the ~15in2 left cheek inlet.
> >> The diffuser was designed to hopefully be more efficient in a climb configuration.
> >> So the total radiators frontal area has been increased by 50% while the air in has increased 75%.
> >> The unknown is that being in the heater circuit we don't know the total flow through the secondary rad compared with the primary rad.
> >>
> >> Testing on the ground yield an approx 15-20C drop in coolant after 30mins of 1800rpm idle.
> >>
> >> Flight Testing Results the next day: OAT 21C (70F)
> >> Coolant Temps max’d on climb at 93C (200F) down 15C on highest Flight 3 climb temp with a 4C higher OAT.
> >> Coolant Temps dropped to 83C (181F) as speed got to 147 KIAS (Cruise is published as 192 KIAS but we haven’t expanded the envelope to date)
> >> I’m very pleased with this result.
> >>
> >> Oil Temps are high. I would much prefer them below 80C (176F)
> >> I’ll be interested to see what oil temp does as speed rises, but my hunch is it needs more air (increase air to oil cooler from a diameter of 77mm to 100mm)
> >>
> >> Slow Speed Tests:
> >> Vs Clean Stall is at 67 KIAS row 2011 (Glasair claims 70 Knots at Gross)
> >> Vso Full Flap Stall is at 57 KIAS row 2062 & 2083 (Glasair claims 59 Knots at Gross)
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Steve Izett
> >> Perth Western Australia
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
>
>
> --
>
> --


--

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster