Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3075818 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:40 -0500 Received: from edward (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i2CG1Xs2027079 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000c01c4084b$043c3300$2402a8c0@edward> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Performance Report on Prototype EDDIE Manifold Report Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:59:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01C40821.1B06CCF0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C40821.1B06CCF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Finn Lassen=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:16 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Performance Report on Prototype EDDIE = Manifold Report Ed Anderson wrote: So while I would have liked to have make a couple of flights to = evaluate the higher rpm operation before going on to the next design, it = was not to be. Whoa! Not so fast. Don't take it apart yet! Why can't you do several = flight tests? Just adjust it on the ground. Go fly. Land. move it an = inch on the ground, go fly, etc. Finn Could probably do that Finn. However, my primary objective was to = improve my take power performance, the ability to get more power at = higher (flight) rpms is secondary since, I seldom cruise any higher than = 5500 rpm. Besides, I need to get started on the next version so I can = get it ready for Sun & Fun. After all, it wouldn't do to show up with a = variable length manifold that wouldn't vary - now would it? Ed ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C40821.1B06CCF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Finn=20 Lassen
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 = 9:16=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Performance=20 Report on Prototype EDDIE Manifold Report

Ed Anderson wrote:
So while I would have liked to have = make a=20 couple of flights to evaluate the higher rpm operation before going = on to=20 the next design, it was not to be.
Whoa! Not so fast. Don't take it apart yet! Why can't you do = several=20 flight tests? Just adjust it on the ground. Go fly. Land. move it an = inch on=20 the ground, go fly, etc.

Finn

Could=20 probably do that Finn.  However, my primary objective was to = improve my=20 take power performance, the ability to get more power at higher = (flight) rpms=20 is secondary since, I seldom cruise any higher than 5500 rpm.  = Besides, I=20 need to get started on the next version so I can get it ready for Sun = &=20 Fun.  After all, it wouldn't do to show up with a variable length = manifold that wouldn't vary - now would it?
Ed

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C40821.1B06CCF0--