Return-Path: <dcarter@datarecall.net>
Received: from smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.81] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with SMTP id 3073326 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:27:36 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO Davidscmptr) (dcarter11@sbcglobal.net@66.138.57.136 with login)
  by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 03:25:53 -0000
Message-ID: <078601c40718$7efc73e0$6401a8c0@Davidscmptr>
Reply-To: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net>
From: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-3073128@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: marvel mystery oil?
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:25:25 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

Richard,

I don't remember reading about your adapter.  Could you tell me more -
private e-mail if it's already been described on the list?

David

DO NOT ARCHIVE  [ Does this work on the FlyRotary list?]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard" <unicorn@gdsys.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:24 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: marvel mystery oil?


> Just a reminder! With my adapter on the oil metering pump, you can use any
> oil you feel comfortable with, and don't have to mess with mixing or worry
> about oil settling in your tank. Can anyone explain to me why there is no
> one using an adapter in an airplane? I am already getting inquiries for an
> adapter for the RX8. What do the car people see different?
>
> Richard.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charlie & Tupper England" <cengland@netdoor.com>
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:59 PM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: marvel mystery oil?
>
>
> Bulent Aliev wrote:
>
> > On 3/10/04 10:46 AM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >     Greetings,
> >
> >     Is anyone still using MMO for their fuel additive? I think Tracy
> >     used it for a while, but I'm not sure if he still does. Is there a
> >     consensus of whether this stuff will do the job for us? I add an
> >     extra 4 oz of it to the RX-7 tank at every fill, but that doesn't
> >     prove much.
> >
> >     The reason I ask, is that I've been using a "normal" TC-3 type oil
> >     in the plane. I've had a problem getting it to mix well, and it
> >     sometimes wants to just sit in the low part of the tank. I'm sure
> >     I can shake, slosh, etc the plane around enough to get it to mix,
> >     but I'd rather find something that is thinner, and will stay in
> >     solution better. It just seems like MMO would satisfy that
> >     requirement.
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Rusty
> >
> >
> > Rusty, Paul Lamar conducted a oil burning test to see how much
> > “sludge” is left after burning out.
> > Turned out 2 cycle oil was the best MMO was not that good for this
> > application.
> > Bulent
>
> His test was 'interesting', but if Tracy, Ed, & probably others are
> getting unburned 2stroke oil scavenged from the combustion chamber into
> their crankcases, I gotta ask if his test has any significance in this
> application.
>
> What do you guys that are flying think?
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>