Return-Path: Received: from mailout1.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.27] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3072377 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:30:16 -0500 Received: from Jarrett (cust140-67.weyburn-leg.accesscomm.ca [216.174.140.67]) by mailout1.accesscomm.ca (Access Communications) with SMTP id i2AFTlwU027718 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:29:47 -0600 Message-ID: <001101c406b4$8284aeb0$8200a8c0@Jarrett> From: "JJ JOHNSON" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: installed engine widths Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:29:42 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01C40682.37B65D70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C40682.37B65D70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In my proposed installation the Rads [both oil and coolant] will be = located outside the cowl area so that shouldn't be a concern.. At least = thats the plan ;-) Jarrett ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Finn Lassen=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:54 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: installed engine widths Don't forget room for your radiator(s) and oil cooler. Removing the = radiators from the cowl cheeks sure makes for a nice snout, but they've = got to go somewhere... Finn JJ JOHNSON wrote: I'm curious as to the installed width of the 13b or 20b's that some of = you have on your birds. Assuming a turbo installation and a spintech exhaust down below and fuel injection. How narrow could a guy make his overall = cowl width at the firewall? What would be a 'safe' number? This could/would mean a narrower engine mount because it would seem that, that might be = the widest pnt on most mounts out there right now.. or an I way off in = thinking that? Curious.. Jarrett Johnson Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C40682.37B65D70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In my proposed installation the Rads = [both oil and=20 coolant] will be located outside the cowl area so that shouldn't be a=20 concern.. At least thats the plan ;-)

Jarrett

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Finn=20 Lassen
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft

Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 = 8:54=20 AM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = installed engine=20 widths

Don't forget room for your radiator(s) and oil cooler. = Removing=20 the radiators from the cowl cheeks sure makes for a nice snout, but = they've=20 got to go somewhere...

Finn

JJ JOHNSON wrote:

I'm curious as to the installed width of the 13b or 20b's that = some of you have on your birds. Assuming a turbo installation and a spintech exhaust down below and fuel injection. How narrow could a guy make his overall = cowl width at the firewall? What would be a 'safe' number? This could/would mean a narrower engine mount because it would seem that, that might be = the widest pnt on most mounts out there right now.. or an I way off in = thinking that? Curious.. Jarrett Johnson

Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive: http://lancai= ronline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C40682.37B65D70--