Return-Path: Received: from mailout1.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.27] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3072265 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:46:58 -0500 Received: from Jarrett (cust140-67.weyburn-leg.accesscomm.ca [216.174.140.67]) by mailout1.accesscomm.ca (Access Communications) with SMTP id i2AEkvwU022392 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:46:57 -0600 Message-ID: <012d01c406ae$86d022c0$8200a8c0@Jarrett> From: "JJ JOHNSON" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re:installed engine widths Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:46:52 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 I'm curious as to the installed width of the 13b or 20b's that some of you have on your birds. Assuming a turbo installation and a spintech exhaust down below and fuel injection. How narrow could a guy make his overall cowl width at the firewall? What would be a 'safe' number? This could/would mean a narrower engine mount because it would seem that, that might be the widest pnt on most mounts out there right now.. or an I way off in thinking that? Curious.. Jarrett Johnson