Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3070531 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:11:55 -0500 Received: from rad ([65.0.140.223]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040309151155.BCHV15240.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:11:55 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] air pocket in cooling system Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:09:54 -0600 Message-ID: <005801c405e8$943aa780$6001a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Hi Paul, Can you post another pic of this thermostat housing area, with the temp sensor visible? Are you saying the stock temp sensor is above the thermostat? The water pump housings that I have, locate the temp sensor below the thermostat, which would be immersed in coolant if the level is up to the bottom of the thermostat as you described. Is there any chance this higher fitting you describe was originally a level sensor? As for air pockets, my rev-1 system had a pretty big loop of AN-16 hose out of the top of the thermostat housing, that went all the way down to the radiator below the engine. That loop stayed full of air all the time. I figured that there wasn't enough flow to force the air pocket down the long slope and into the radiator. It seems the hose was large enough to allow the water to flow along the bottom of the hose, and leave the air in the top. It didn't hurt anything, but it always bugged me. In rev-2, I did away with the air separator tank, and have only an overflow bottle. The rad cap is mounted on the thermostat housing (no room for a thermostat though), so I can actually fill the engine without taking hoses off (another improvement from rev-1). I have the option of adding an aluminum, pressurized expansion tank in place of the plastic overflow tank if it proves necessary, but for now, I decided that simple is good. Cheers, Rusty (running again by the end of this week...really...don't laugh, it could happen)