Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #6248
From: Mark Steitle <msteitle@mail.utexas.edu>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ideal Cooling System Plumbing -- PLUS 'best coolant leak indicator'
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:26:17 -0500
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
David,
I'm using p/n 2584 as shown at http://www.pegasusautoracing.com/pdfs/065.pdf
While they refer to it as an expansion tank, I believe the correct term is purge
tank.

My level sensor came from McMaster Carr.  They have quite a selection, but
only a few that can handle the heat we're asking, and are reasonably priced.
Search on "liquid level sensors".  The one I selected was about $28.  It worked
fine, except I had to replace the flimsy washer for a better one.  I plan to wire
it up to my annunciator panel.

Mark S.


At 02:04 PM 3/4/2004 -0600, you wrote:
Mark, thanks a lot for the photo and explanation.  Fills out my
understanding a lot more.

I think we've resolved the ambiguities of my original input.  I agree with
all you said in this response.
    -  Air trap in the thermostat bypass area seems to be a real "gotcha" if
not carefully handled.  Frying an engine on initial startup has to be a real
bummer.

I'm glad you are going to monitor coolant level in the expansion tank.  I
may not have been paying attention so I'll ask:  Are you using a "custom"
expansion tank or one from an auto?  If homemade, will you scrounge a
"level" sensor from a car's expansion tank?  Any particular one?  Already
done it?

Will your expansion tank be "highest possible"?  Or "anywhere" relative to
top of engine?

David

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Steitle" <msteitle@mail.utexas.edu>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:19 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ideal Cooling System Plumbing -- PLUS 'best coolant
leak indicator'


> David,
> Somewhere I got the impression that your radiator returns were on the top
> of the radiators.  Bottom
> should be fine.
>
> I'll embed a couple of comments (and a wp flow diagram) to your comments.
;-)
>
> Mark
>
> >The system I propose draws COOLANT off of the BOTTOM.  The AIR goes out
the
> >top, at least when you are filling the system on the ground with no flow.
> >The main purpose is to be able to FILL the system and PURGE ALL AIR -
right
> >out the top of the engine - the highest spot you can find.
>
> Be alert to the possibility of air being trapped in the bypass circuit of
> the wp housing.
> Since I had removed the dual thermostats and welded up the bypass holes, I
> had to remove
> the hex plug (unique to the 20B) on the side of the wp housing to get the
> pump to
> prime.  Not sure how you would accomplish this on the 13B.  Maybe
drill/tap
> a 1/8npt
> in the bypass area of the wp housing?  If you kept the thermostat, just
> remove it while
> filling the system.
>
>   HOWEVER, if plain old EXPERIENCE were to ever
> >indicate that air was being trapped in the top of rad, then an AIR VENT
LINE
> >could be installed at high point in rad or a hose there that would feed
back
> >into the bottom (below liquid level) in pressurized expansion tank
>
> This is what I have been recommending.  But I plumbed mine to the side
> fitting of the exp.
> tank, still below liquid level.
>
> >- would
> >be a "2ND AIR VENT LINE", with same function as the air vent line from
> >highest point in engine block back to the expansion tank, below liq
level.
> >Both lines would be flowing a small amt of coolant that would be
bypassing
> >the rad, not being cooled, so, again, the caution to use SMALL AIR BLEED
> >LINES or RESTRICTOR in the lines.
>
> A line from the top of the engine shouldn't hurt anything, except that the
> coolant won't
> be cooled.  As you mention, this is not an issue if the line is kept
> small.  However,
> if you have a method to bleed the air at time of filling, then I don't see
> where this line is
> needed.  Any air will be caught in the flow and eventually be separated
> through the
> radiator air-bleeder.  But, I don't see where it would hurt anything,
> unless it were to
> break in flight.
>
> >Air in the system:  We have hoses at the water pump inlet and outlet, and
> >the pump is high up on the engine in a "plugs normal installation".
> >     -  Where does the hose from the pump outlet feed back into the
engine
> >block - high or low on engine? (Basic question that I can't visualize
> >because I don't have an engine yet)?
>
> The wp outlet connects to the top of the front side housing.  There are
two
> holes on
> that housing where the coolant enters and exits the engine.  From the
exit,
> it goes
> through the wp housing passages and up through the thermostat and out to
> the radiator(s).
> (Ref. attachment)
>
> >     -  Likewise, where is the "hot coolant outlet" from the engine block
> >where the hose connects to the radiator?  Should be high up near the top
> >like on all cars?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> >Anyway, the assumed short hose from pump outlet to somewhere on engine
could
> >have a leak;
>
> There is no hose here, only a gasket.  (see attachment)
>
> >  likewise, the hot coolant hose that runs DOWN from near the top
> >of block to the rads could have a leak anywhere below that outlet from
block
> >all the way down to connections to the radiators.
> >     - As long as there is a head of coolant in the engine, there is
going to
> >be a head of coolant down at the rads, and so the pump is going to have
> >coolant at the bottom of rads to suck UP to the pump.
>
> Yes, provided we're drawing off the bottom of the radiator and not the
top.
>
> >     - I don't envision any significant pump-stopping air at the bottom
where
> >pump is sucking from as long as there is any coolant in the block.
> >  The
> >pump is going to suck from bottom of rads and pump out of its outlet into
> >the engine block and/or out the "leak" until there is ZERO coolant left
in
> >the rads, at which time the pump stops ciruclating - but not because of
> >"system configuration", rather for lack of liquid.
>
>
> This is where the rotary is different than other engines.  It can get an
> air-lock in
> the coolant bypass circuit.  Normally happens when first filling, or
> re-filling the
> cooling system.  By the time the thermostat opens, you've damaged the
engine.
> Once you've "primed" the system, this is probably not going to
> happen.  Although
> a coolant shortage could cause the pump to loose its prime.
>
>
> >     -  Again, I simply assume any AIR THAT IS BEING SUCKED IN AT THE
LEAK
> >will be up ON TOP of the coolant, not down at the bottom of the liquid
> >column where the pump sucks from.
>
> I think that the air could accumulate anywhere there is insufficient flow
> to move it
> along to somewhere else.
>
>
>
> >Now, to address the discussion of "What is the best indication of a
leak?"
> >
> >     -  THIS IS THE BEST SYSTEM:  It tells you coolant level in EXPANSION
> >TANK has decreased too much, BEFORE the level in the BLOCK has even begun
to
> >suck air.   This is the ideal warning - warned BEFORE the engine is
damaged,
> >gives "more" time (depending on speed of leak) to take action to land and
> >save the engine, if that is possible, given where you are and where the
> >closest landing spot is.
>
> I plan on monitoring Coolant Level (sensor in exp. tank), Coolant
Pressure,
> and
> Coolant Temp using Tracy's EM-2.
>
> Mark S.
>


>



>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster