Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 08:02:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3062029 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 23:25:10 -0500 Received: from user-33qt1cc.dialup.mindspring.com ([199.174.133.140] helo=Carol) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AykQ1-00077A-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 20:25:10 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <00e901c401a0$ac512250$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 13B smooth running issues X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:25:05 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slade" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 7:12 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 13B smooth running issues > > I purchased a 5/8 heater nipple from > > CarQuest that had a 1/2"NPT fitting... > We must be talking about different holes. This one's almost 1/8 NPT, but the > same theory should apply. > > By the way - I discovered an "interesting" failure mode yesterday.... > > I took her out for her first taxi test. First impression was that the engine > was running MUCH smoother with the prop in place. Still rich, but much more > responsive. There was a metallic noise I hadn't heard before, so I swung her > around and taxied straight back. As I shut her down I noticed a prop > vibration that didnt seem right. > > There was a LOT of lag on the prop. Buly peered down into the flywheel area > and spotted a bolt lying at the bottom of the case, just waiting for the > best opportunity to jump up and attack the expensive and really important > piece of wood right behind the redrive. :( > > Wiggling the prop a bit more I noticed that the flywheel was moving a little > with respect to the counterweights behind it. I removed the redrive. The > entire damper plate / flywheel assembly was loose. I removed the damper > plate and found, behind it, the 6 small bolts and one very large central > bolt that hold the flywheel in place were all loose. I said 6. Actually > there were 5. The other one, the one Buly found, had already come out. This > situation could have taken a very serious bite out of my ass if the > remaining bolts had come out during the first flight. Can you say > "catastrophic failure"? > > I know what happened. Three years ago, when we were making the engine mount, > we had assembled the redrive to the engine. We'd mounted the flywheel and > damper plate, probably finger tight, at that time. For three years the > engine had sat around with that damper plate in place hiding the loose > bolts. When it finally came time to install the redrive properly I had > forgotten that the flywheel had never been torqued down. It had been "part > of the engine" for all that time, and I'd ASSumed that it had been correctly > installed when the engine was built. I guess this is why we do taxi testing. > > Today I'll pick up a new bolt from NAPA and a new bottle of locktite. > > Don't feel bad, John. With our projects spread out over years instead of weeks, it is very easy to see how that could happen. Paul Conner > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >