Message

Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3050065 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:28:20 -0500 Received: from rad ([65.0.137.125]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040228222819.VYLO1895.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:28:19 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 13B - No start problem Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:28:20 -0600 Message-ID: <00f101c3fe4a$2b9f6fd0$6001a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00F2_01C3FE17.E104FFD0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00F2_01C3FE17.E104FFD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am also having trouble picturing where I could have gone wrong in the wiring. It seems unlikely to me that I could have grounded all 4 of the injector leads. Your idea about testing with the main connector = unplugged is a good place to start. But assuming that checks out OK (no ground = with the connector unplugged), I really would have no idea what to do next. = I can't believe that I would put all 4 injector leads in the wrong hole. = BTW, I did not install an injector disable switch. =20 =20 Hi David, =20 Ed's message is great, and I won't try to add much to it. =20 =20 I did just take a look at the EC-2 plug again, and noticed that the = primary injector wires are pins 17 and 18, with a ground on 19. The secondary wires are pins 35 and 36, with the ground on 37. These are supposed to = be larger wire than the rest, so they don't fit as well in the plug. All = it would take is a strand of wire between 18 and 19, or between 36 and 37 = to cause one injector to open up when you apply power. I'm betting you'll = find your problem in the connector. Of course it also wouldn't be too hard = to accidentally swap one of the injector wires with one of the grounds, = which might do it too. Naturally, I would never make such a mistake (ahem...) :-) =20 Good luck, Rusty (off to TIG some stainless)=20 ------=_NextPart_000_00F2_01C3FE17.E104FFD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

I am also = having=20 trouble picturing where I could have gone wrong in the wiring. It = seems=20 unlikely to me that I could have grounded all 4 of the injector = leads. =20 Your idea about testing with the main connector unplugged is a good = place to=20 start. But assuming that checks out OK (no ground with the = connector=20 unplugged), I really would have no idea what to do next. I = can’t believe=20 that I would put all 4 injector leads in the wrong hole. BTW, I = did not=20 install an injector disable switch.

Hi=20 David,

Ed's message = is great, and I=20 won't try to add much to it.

I did just = take a look at=20 the EC-2 plug again, and noticed that the primary injector wires = are pins=20 17 and 18, with a ground on 19. The secondary wires are pins 35 and 36, with the ground on = 37. =20 These are supposed to be larger wire than the rest, so they don't fit as = well in=20 the plug. All it would take is a strand of wire between 18 and 19, = or=20 between 36 and 37 to cause one injector to open up when you apply = power. =20 I'm betting you'll find your problem in the = connector. Of=20 course it also wouldn't be too hard to accidentally swap one = of the=20 injector wires with one of the grounds, which might do it = too. =20 Naturally, I would never make such a mistake (ahem...) =20 :-)

Good=20 luck,

Rusty (off to = TIG some=20 stainless)

------=_NextPart_000_00F2_01C3FE17.E104FFD0--