X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <ceengland7@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yh0-f48.google.com ([209.85.213.48] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.6)
  with ESMTPS id 6440117 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:03:06 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.48; envelope-from=ceengland7@gmail.com
Received: by mail-yh0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f73so443891yha.21
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 08:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=HnfDMvVgid5AoToWcWkBa1FgJqiq6ynKu3UAUVsOf9w=;
        b=lN2fXIvCv8u4HLfKPVVf/+vFWyToHaapL0KclhcTK6mp3W8ydW8GPqLTmqvhZFJUDW
         xPOCuOHC5ABeV15GQjjT0cyZKgTxwmkI1LcoqsYd+WLdj6jmxWCgwQsdI57ee4XIpRCU
         YHYa1kh11S5VdesKUecAoVgKf2rRNnNvSyWgT0wxs+Do7S6WixzCT60JUroCCAqcY0tk
         yfopaU6t0C5RV8+foriN18ej8t6eIqJj7SnE8j2SgrCuLr8C41IKhDyzs9gHRxtrp/DF
         fAnS3ym1kcOT1OEe2qm528UOGB57CezDfOz3Hg9v46TA+kUBImSjfcW9U8ZHZRlRoMR6
         2t1A==
X-Received: by 10.236.88.108 with SMTP id z72mr1018551yhe.65.1377356550537;
        Sat, 24 Aug 2013 08:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <ceengland7@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.10.17] (adsl-98-95-185-136.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.185.136])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u52sm6468397yhg.5.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 24 Aug 2013 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5218CB04.8010804@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:02:28 -0500
From: Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Injector Location
References: <list-6438613@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-6438613@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 08/23/2013 07:56 AM, Thomas Mann wrote:
> I wonder why nobody sets up the second set of injectors the same way 
> the primaries are setup (i.e. shoot through the iron into the intake 
> port. )
> That would sure simplify things and pretty much match up the fuel 
> delivery method.
> Is there a logical/rational reason this isn't configured in this manner?
> ......or .... has someone already done this?
> T Mann
I'll take a wild shot. I didn't do it because the bosses aren't in the 
irons. I *suspect* that Mazda didn't do it because (at least on the 
Renesis) there's really no place to put them & be able to feed secondary 
fuel to both the main & 'aux' secondary intakes. There's also some 
evidence that moving the injectors upstream can, in some cases, help BSFC.

Charlie