Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:44:24 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.126] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3001773 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:45:57 -0500 Received: from user-33qt59a.dialup.mindspring.com ([199.174.149.42] helo=Carol) by turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Auewe-0006E5-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:45:56 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <002901c3f8c4$0d686610$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: exhaust X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:45:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Perry Mick" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 9:45 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: exhaust > sqpilot@earthlink wrote: > > >My 13b engine is ready to run....I ordered a VAM muffler, but since it has > >not yet happened, I was wondering if I could get away with using the stock > >cast iron manifold with a straight pipe attached to it, which would exit > >through the bottom of the cowling. I should mention that this is on a > >pusher. George Graham told me that he was using a straight, (or slightly > >bent) pipe, and possibly Perry Mick is or was using the stock cast iron > >manifold? My thinking is that although it is heavy, it might possibly > >absorb a lot of the initial heat as it is exiting the exhaust ports, acting > >like a heat collector, and I might not need expensive inconel or 321 > >stainless after the exhaust goes through the stock manifold first? Would > >the cast iron manifold absorb much of the heat and possibly muffle some of > >the noise as it is bounced around inside of the stock manifold? I'm > >probably grasping at straws, but with all the knowledge and experience in > >this group, I figure it wouldn't hurt to ask. Thanks to all for your > >opinions and advice. Paul Conner, 13b powered SQ2000 > > > > > > > > > Yes I still use the stock exhaust manifold. It takes all the heat abuse. > I have a short pipe made from standard automotive stuff at a muffler > shop, it shows no sign of wear after 5 years and 440 hours because the > cast iron takes the direct hit. No stainless or iconel or anything > special. You want to be sure to keep the heatshields on. > > -- > Perry Mick > http://www.ductedfan.com > > Thank you very much, Perry....I might just be on to something here. The heat shields you are referring to ....are these Mazda heat shields, or home-brew? Any pictures? Thanks again. If I go this route, engine start can be next week. Paul Conner > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >