Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #59657
From: <ARGOLDMAN@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: O2 Sensor data, Steve B.
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:46:29 -0500 (EST)
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Donnknow about the Ellison not having a regulator. The device on the fuel receiving end sure looks like a regulator with it's input in the upstream throat of the unit. Perhaps it is something different.

 

Below is a reprint from Ellison's catalog.

 

The problem that Ed's friend had seems to fit into this explanation perfectly.

 

Now to the design of the Ellison. It is basically a sophisticated posa type carb in that as the throat of the unit is opened, it uncovers a series of holes on a tube, which increase in number (possibly diameter-- haven't seen one in a long time--. The tube with the holes can rotate 90* to change the mixtue-- if pointed into the airstream of the throat you get idle cutoff, perpendicular get full rich and anywhere in between varying mixture.The problem that I had with mine-- years ago was thatasd the body is opened, the airflow across the tube gets more fuel vapor and raw fuel from the side that has more holes and thus the mixture of air/fuel vapor and raw fuel is not consistent over the length of the tube. The side that has few holes is very lean and the side with most holes is rich.

In an ideal world, as the mixture progresses through the manifold it homoginizes, however, I found that not to be the case. With the twists and turns of the manifold, the mixture was quite different cylinder to cylinder (what are those).

 

Ellison suggested an oil heated manifold (which had no effect). I ended up getting rid of it and going to multipoint injection. Granted this was on a VW type engine. but the concept holds.

 

With the aforementioned posa (Much more of a similar problem as all of the fuel was "dripped" from the same place with a conical needle creating the increase/decrease) people were using a "swirl plate" in the induction system to get a better mixing of the fuel/air.

 

 

FROM ELLISON WEB SITE...................

 

Gravity feed may be used with many high wing installations and some installations which have a fuselage tank. The fuel pressure requirements of each unit are as follows:

Model Min (PSI) Max (PSI)
EFS-2 2 6
EFS-3A 0.5 6
EFS-4 2 6
EFS-4-5 2 6
EFS-5 2 6
EFS-10 12 15

Gravity feed will provide about 1.0 PSI for every 30 inches of head. For example: The installation of an EFS-2 requires that the bottom of the tank must be at least 60 inches vertical distance (plus the head loss of the valves, fittings, lines and filters) above the Throttle Body to provide the minimum required pressure. Remember that this height must be measured in the steepest climb attitude for aircraft with engines in front, and in the steepest decent attitude for aircraft with pusher engines.  In this worst case attitude, the fuel system should be flow tested with fuel flowing through the TBI fuel inlet finger screen, and demonstrate a flow rate 150% of the fuel flow required by the engine at it's maximum power output, when operating on the last gallon in the fuel tank.

A common installation error made by our customers who wish to install the Throttle Body, but don't want to install a fuel pump, is to try to design a gravity feed fuel system where only minimum head in available. This is a dangerous situation because the Throttle Body will meter fuel adequately at low power settings with fuel pressure well below the specified minimum, but at high power settings the Throttle Body is unable to meter sufficient fuel.  As a result, the engine will run lean at full throttle.

It is common aircraft practice to design a fuel system which has both an engine driven pump and a backup pump such as an electrical boost pump, or mechanical wobble pump. Systems which rely completely on electrical pumps without any backup system should be avoided.

An excellent article about fuel system design by Lyle Powell may be accessed by clicking on Fuel Systems for Homebuilts.  

 
In a message dated 2/26/2013 1:10:33 P.M. Central Standard Time, res12@fairpoint.net writes:
I am aware of some of the problems with the Elison TB. As far as I know, Elison did not use a pressure regulator, which is what Rotec added. They also realized the mixture range problem, and added the reference pressure probe to the pressure regulator. That is what I am now at, finding the best location to pick up this reference pressure.
 
Richard Sohn
N2071U

http://www.fairpoint.net/~res12/home.html
 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:04 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: O2 Sensor data, Steve B.
 
Richard, regarding the  Ellison TB
 
I have a friend who tried an Ellison on his rotary - never could get the low end and high end to work together.  It appeared that (at least for the size Ellison he was using) that the range of airflow quantity below idle and WOT was outside the range of the size Ellison he was using.  If he got the idle set right, he ran out of fuel on the top end.  If he got the top end running right, the idle was too rich.
 
His engine eventually quit in flight, airframe was destroyed - he fortunately escaped injury.  Just thought I would pass it on for what its worth.
 
Most O2 heater voltages are 12 -13 Volts - but, not certain about the Renesis O2.
Sensor output for narrow band is generally  from 0 -1 volt, Wide band from 0 -5 volts.
 
Ed
 
Edward L. Anderson
Anderson Electronic Enterprises LLC
305 Reefton Road
Weddington, NC 28104
http://www.andersonee.com
http://www.eicommander.com
 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:27 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: O2 Sensor data, Steve B.
 
I am planing to use an O2 sensor from a 2009 Renesis on my test engine. Does anyone know what the heater supply is? I am measureing 2.4Ohm, cold. Probably 5V? The connection is coming out of the ECU.
Would appreciate any info on that.
Still having issues with the mixture setting on the Rotec TBI (Ellison). No real flying yet, just a lot of crow-hopping down the runway.
 
Richard Sohn
N2071U

http://www.fairpoint.net/~res12/home.html
 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 8:32 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: O2 Sensor data, Steve B.
 
Forgot to say, under diog. for RX8 they call both sensors HO2 not AF.  ???  David.


From: hoursaway1@comcast.net
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:29:12 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] O2 Sensor data,  Steve B.

Steve, another update on O2 sensor data,,, for a 2007 RX8 frnt. HO2 sensor is read in mil. Amps,,, 1.0 mil. amp is center point under accell is looking for decrease,  under deccell looking for increase,  did not give min.-max. for the high & low that I think could have been useful.  David.


From: "Steven W. Boese" <SBoese@uwyo.edu>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:50:49 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Crickets & progress

David,

 

Do you remember ballpark values for the amps and volts?

 

Thanks,

 

Steve

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [flyrotary@lancaironline.net] on behalf of hoursaway1@comcast.net [hoursaway1@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 7:19 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Crickets & progress

Steve, I'm not sure why but when diog. the other day on 07 Mazda 3 for a code P2188,  Snap-on scanner shows me amps for pre cat. AF sensor & volts for post cat. O2 sensor & that is how they describe them in Mitchel Automotive diog. text.  Hope this helps in some way.  David R. Cook  RV6A Rotary.


--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2641/6130 - Release Date: 02/25/13

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster