Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #59114
From: Ernest Chrisltey <echristley@att.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: flow path in conventional radiator
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:16:41 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
On 10/23/2012 06:44 AM, Mark Steitle wrote:
Bill, 

Since Charlie hasn't posted any pictures or sketches of his design, I was referencing more what you'll find in auto installations than in a/c.  Still the principles are the same, namely that the coolant naturally flows to the bottom and air goes to the top.  If it gets low enough, the pump will begin sucking air and will soon loose prime.  This will happen much quicker if you're drawing off the upper tank.  Of course, if the radiator is located below the engine it will take longer for this to happen than if it is beside the engine because the air pocket will be inside the engine rather than in the radiator.  If you have a coolant leak in flight, you'll benefit from more time to get on the ground rather than less. 

I don't see where it makes any difference which tank you return the coolant to, but when supplying the pump, any air will risk loss of prime.  So, it makes sense to me to draw from the bottom and return to the top.  At least that's how I understand it.

 In the end its Charlie's decision.

Mark,

My installation is done and is working, so I don't see myself making great efforts to change it around; but this makes so much sense that I'll rearrange it if I ever have to rework it in the future.  The downside to this arrangement is that it will be much more difficult  to remove entrapped air from the system if there isn't a bleed in the line.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster