X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma04.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.42] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with ESMTP id 5603295 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:16:36 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.42; envelope-from=CozyGirrrl@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.75]) by imr-ma04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5GDFp4s027042 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:15:51 -0400 Received: from core-dsa005a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dsa005.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.252.81]) by mtaomg-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 42FD9E000081 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:15:51 -0400 (EDT) From: CozyGirrrl@aol.com Message-ID: <2b34a.4fb1c9f0.3d0de107@aol.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:15:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: inlets and outlets To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_2b34a.4fb1c9f0.3d0de107_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 5004 X-Originating-IP: [205.188.66.134] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1339852551; bh=BhnZrdcBmJxeb7LxziC4WSolkv4t7bvrAlJNIP83x0k=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A0ae3sthxwsKaesT4O7PA7+B87ug3DCIzvb4YAH0swvLd3ise6nDcMytWznfnA7Tj qkyV6uQtTu/8WGUV8I6M/GNAP3OWgAZ6cKwacNVAz2Qe3CbIJY/oh5LYxkEMQEjAsd SJrk+jrO5HnlPjEYscfxFvUM+iCAuQy6/2DbSybM= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:474938784:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294b4fdc87076f43 --part1_2b34a.4fb1c9f0.3d0de107_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No, these are going to have to be tanks top and bottom. ...C&R In a message dated 6/15/2012 10:17:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time, thomasmann51@gmail.com writes: The double pass radiator increases the efficiency of the radiator by about 50%. You have tanks on both sides. One side has a partition in the tank with the inlet at the top and outlet at the bottom. The coolant flows across the top half of the core into the non-partitioned tank then back across the lower half back to the partitioned tank and out the outlet. That's the way I went with a custom Ron Davis radiator. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:49 PM, <_CozyGirrrl@aol.com_ (mailto:CozyGirrrl@aol.com) > wrote: I can certainly see the logic in a single pass radiator of in on top and out on bottom. With a dual pass design (tanks top and bottom) what would be the advantage of inlets and outlets on the bottom -vs- the top in a case with the water pump above the top of the radiator? In both cases their would be a vent line to the swirl pot from the top tanks. ...C&R --part1_2b34a.4fb1c9f0.3d0de107_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No, these are going to have to be tanks top and bottom.

...C&R

In a message dated 6/15/2012 10:17:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 thomasmann51@gmail.com writes:

=

The double pass radiator increases th= e=20 efficiency of the radiator by about 50%.

You have tanks on both sides. One sid= e has a=20 partition in the tank with the inlet at the top and outlet at the=20 bottom.

The coolant flows across the top half= of the=20 core into the non-partitioned tank then back across the lower half back t= o the=20 partitioned tank and out the outlet.

That's the way I went with a custom R= on=20 Davis radiator.=20

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:49 PM, <CozyGirrrl@aol.com> wrote:

I can certainly see the logic in a single pass radiator of in on t= op=20 and out on bottom.

With a dual pass design (tanks top and bottom) what would be the= =20 advantage of inlets and outlets on the bottom -vs- the top in a case wi= th=20 the water pump above the top of the radiator?

In both cases their would be a vent line to the swirl pot fro= m the=20 top tanks.

...C&R

--part1_2b34a.4fb1c9f0.3d0de107_boundary--