X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5481276 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:31:44 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.214.180; envelope-from=keltro@gmail.com Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so2189483obb.25 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:31:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=k6tipd8t3ufrEe0aEiOxAt2p8QSKww6HuthAl3dQDwg=; b=k7N8yXJExwt43Zraho7Q5KtuzTjifAEQBN5/YSoOMar4PPNT8v9IrbXL/5H664m9rP i7vu7Zt5h1sU3soZCU4y9uIE4le0mUMJEL7QJ+vBalw3ceFtDBN5IgeRaPKHyppJAKF8 QbyHNDgW0ZyHWaKtnzyi/iBvWRCWMsUtvoxKtdXpJDwyDzsHwP9/zEiOeBNTIj7eeqLK zbLf3Dk2kfV6FLa4kSxBceDiPJNtsaDsw9Kl/XyELXMzk2O0R26ioB11g18s81i284NR q5qi9DtQTe9pSMsjDOVrKQbL5Lkj9pw7TyoENKwy495XcqTufGl41Dpd+bixrPfyWY0F t34w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.155.35 with SMTP id vt3mr7275397obb.63.1334410269372; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.165.67 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:31:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:31:09 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Possible auto fuel resistant epoxy From: Kelly Troyer To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0446326e17313e04bda39af4 --f46d0446326e17313e04bda39af4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Lynn, It has also been my understanding that the Vinyl Esters were more resistant than many Epoxies to fuel (particularly auto fuel) but do not recall discussions on this forum about testing of the various Epoxy or Vinyl Ester formulations in auto or 100LL fuel over a long term............ Kelly Troyer On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:29 AM, wrote: > ** > Are not the under ground storage tanks made of fiberglass re-enforced > Vinyl Ester? The new fuel blends cannot attack whatever that specific > compounding is involved there. > > Lynn E. Hanover > > In a message dated 4/13/2012 9:02:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > keltro@gmail.com writes: > > Possible auto fuel resistant epoxy for composite tanks............. > > --f46d0446326e17313e04bda39af4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lynn,
=A0
=A0=A0 It has also been my understanding that the Vinyl Esters were mo= re resistant than many Epoxies=A0to fuel (particularly auto fuel) but
do not recall discussions on this forum about=A0=A0testing of=A0the va= rious Epoxy or Vinyl Ester=A0 formulations in auto or 100LL=A0fuel over
a long term............
=A0
Kelly Troyer
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:29 AM, <Lehanover@aol.com> wrote:
Are not the under ground storage tanks made of fiberglass re-enforced<= /div>
Vinyl Ester? The new fuel blends cannot attack whatever that specific = compounding is involved there.
=A0
Lynn E. Hanover
=A0
In a message dated 4/13/2012 9:02:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, keltro@gmail.com write= s:
Possible auto fuel resistant epoxy for composit= e tanks.............



--f46d0446326e17313e04bda39af4--