X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from pacmmta51.windstream.net ([162.39.147.110] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTP id 5476471 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:48:53 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=162.39.147.110; envelope-from=alpha@concordnc.com Return-Path: X-WS-COS: WSOB804 X-Cloudmark-Category: Undefined:Undefined X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=wi2J7rgTjtt66PGN7+JMAiX4/IqmFavmjTO+nE+rCy4= c=1 sm=0 a=yXtjXN6ItgYA:10 a=gXHSltEEXbMA:10 a=bnk8L2HEKzMA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=4JtYyxmAAAAA:8 a=_7xGTstTAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=3YYZ7QMJTrzkvXU5g0oA:9 a=8CQZBJDel3pavfvE5wUA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=pHGAqy4niK0A:10 a=HpQ+XFh0OsKrZTVfHZfTsA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Authentication-Results: pacmmta51 smtp.user=alpha@concordnc.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received: from [71.31.64.230] ([71.31.64.230:42765] helo=[192.168.2.196]) by pacmmta51 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.47 r(39824M)) with ESMTPA id 23/C8-15653-1F0F48F4; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:48:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4F84F0F1.2020808@concordnc.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:48:17 -0400 From: Jim Brewer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: The 16X is A L I V E ! ! ! ! References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I hope you guys are ready for direct fuel injection AND laser ignition (no spark plugs). http://www.caradvice.com.au/125120/mazda-rx-9-16x-rotary-to-get-laser-ignition-report/ On 04/10/2012 04:49 PM, Ernest Christley wrote: > Dwayne Parkinson wrote: >> Excellent question. I'm almost afraid to answer because 1) I'm probably >> wrong and 2) it'll make me seem like I'm obsessing over the engine which >> I guess I really am, but maybe that's OK among fellow FlyRotary members :) >> >> If you look at pictures of the 16X rotor here >> http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=140474 >> >> about mid way down the page there's a comparison between the 16X and the >> 13B rotor. The 16X rotor is almost identical but slightly bigger. I'm >> just looking at the commercial around the 33 second mark and saying "hmm >> that looks bigger than a 13B rotor." >> >> Pretty scientific huh? >> > Dude, you gotta go with what you've got! Woohoo! The 16X is alive. > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >