Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #5674
From: Ken Welter <rotary.coot@verizon.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Non-EFI fuel systems
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:58:41 -0800
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
[FlyRotary] Re: Non-EFI fuel systems
Nice job on the intake manifold, Rusty.    Thanks for the info regarding the Ellison throttlebody.   Did it have a provision for leaning?  (similar to a standard aircraft carb)?   Thanks.  Paul Conner 
 
Thanks, and I'm sure you can imagine that you're seeing the best side :-)   I'll know if it actually fits in about an hour.
 
As for the Ellison, yes, it has a mixture control. 
 
Sorry Ken, but I don't agree with your view of airflow on these units.  I think they're more than suitable for the average NA 13B.  To get a 180 HP, doesn't it take a set amount of air, and fuel?  If so, why would we need so much more airflow than a Lycoming O-360?
 
Cheers,
Rusty (in search of argon) 
 
 
  Sorry to say but I think you are dead wrong on the need for high airflow on the rotary and there is no way 350 CFM will work unless you want to fly a turd.    

 You did a fine job making that high flow manifold and I bet you wont put a 350 CFM throttle body on it.
 
 I had 1000 hrs flying time on my old coot with a 51 Weber and when I rebuilt it I could not get another 51 as they are hard to come by so I went to a 48mm instead and there was a noticeable drop in power and I would switch back to a 51 if I weren't go to a turbo.

 For anyone thinking of a Weber I will say there are pros and cons between a 48 and a 51, the 51 puts out more power but it is temperamental on jetting and it runs rough on the bottom end compared to the 48, there is also a 55mm Weber but I have had no experience with it but would consider it.

 For the best deal on Weber carbs check out performance parts warehouse at http://www.webercarburetors.com

 Ken
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster