X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.212.52] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1)
  with ESMTPS id 5083897 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 09:01:57 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.212.52; envelope-from=thomasmann51@gmail.com
Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so1932724vws.25
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=6/E6uHCqceW63siEKDQTf2xzeYajw2Gxubve/yNz7Pk=;
        b=BQWWV09Fe31qtVt3QwT+UHw3Qg0J3vQDlAJ1peA3FIRqsc9LUInOSDmb9tAWgn6KNl
         sCjKu0fwR6XSIQ/mMylu8s7pu++QvzVEsZWCe4egsXptN+roSKOYq09k5L9WvLdCf2Ow
         yT3P5b7z2ca+/yrRoJV/Ssj3Z97ZtY2c7P47U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.77.4 with SMTP id e4mr1006024vck.14.1312635682213; Sat, 06
 Aug 2011 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.195.197 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-5083604@logan.com>
References: <list-5083604@logan.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:01:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH_WSmrcCPPAr6Z_PB_o2x9AZds06k2f_t1Bu-5Ox44EinH4_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] CG Products Intake Manifold
From: Thomas Mann <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c65a78ecd9904a9d5cfb2

--0016364c65a78ecd9904a9d5cfb2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I talked with Randi and Chrissi about this development. The Idea is to offer
a complete system (intake manifold & airbox) for somewhere in the ballpark
of $2500+.

I forgot what the weight ended up at but it's a vast improvement over other
options I've seen.


On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:33 PM, <DLOMHEIM@aol.com> wrote:

> **
> Very nice...does anyone know what they envision hooking up to the runners?
>
>
> Is their goal to next create an upper manifold that will attach to this
> lower manifold, and also accept a throttle body?
>
> dl
>

--0016364c65a78ecd9904a9d5cfb2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I talked with Randi and Chrissi about this development. The Idea is to offe=
r a complete system (intake manifold &amp; airbox) for somewhere in the bal=
lpark of $2500+.<div><br></div><div>I forgot what the weight ended up at bu=
t it&#39;s a vast improvement over other options I&#39;ve seen.</div>
<div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:33 PM,  <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:DLOMHEIM@aol.com">DLOMHEIM@aol.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<u></u>



<div style=3D"font-family:Arial;color:#000000;font-size:10pt"><font color=
=3D"#000000" size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">
<div>Very nice...does anyone know=A0what=A0they envision hooking up to the=
=20
runners?=A0 </div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>Is their goal to next=A0create=A0an upper manifold that will attach=20
to this lower manifold, and also accept a throttle body?</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>dl</div></font></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--0016364c65a78ecd9904a9d5cfb2--