X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-gy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.160.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTPS id 5071995 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:44:38 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.180; envelope-from=editor.contactmagazine@gmail.com Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so227672gyg.25 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+L8R/vL32Pc3r1I3waR/Qqc/RxYcX2NEZvtmZPVp4Kk=; b=sB8F7FAKT/KWKn+NwGjE2ad8M9WZbxOBhgse4bS2z5kEe4JX+mQdytcyH4lxFcPdRs LcfJ8t6/qrEQKmmrY2Oc1qU9AS6UXQ55AnVH4gRaFLipALot4Xk7boifGI/dxcm9kgek QWozQVIT/QTpiitSF4PMD21oow9Sjm3KXDibU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.157.3 with SMTP id n3mr5304177yhk.5.1312321441867; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.207.5 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: panzera@experimental-aviation.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:44:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU From: Pat Panzera To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f63725fa6ce04a98ca5ae --20cf303f63725fa6ce04a98ca5ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It's not just stalled, portions of it is actually creating negative thrust and the portions that are not contributing to thrust are creating drag on the engine. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Tracy wrote: > No negative effects that I know of. I used one for awhile on my RV-4 but > was not happy with it's efficiency at high speed. Worked great for takeoff > & climb but area near hub was stalled and draggy at cruise & high speed. > > Works better on canards because that area is in turbulent air anyway. > > Tracy > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Samuel Treffinger < > samuel.treffinger@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Tracy, do you know of any negative side affects of using a IVO magnum >> inflight adjustable prop with your psru?? I think John Slade has that >> configuration, but I was wondering if you reccommended it, or reccommended >> against it. >> >> Sam >> > > --20cf303f63725fa6ce04a98ca5ae Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's not just stalled, portions of it is=A0actually=A0creating negative= thrust and the portions that are not contributing to thrust are creating= =A0drag on the engine.=A0

On Mon, Aug 1, = 2011 at 4:57 AM, Tracy <rwstracy@gmail.com> wrote:
No negative effects that I know of.=A0=A0 I= used one for awhile on my RV-4 but was not happy with it's efficiency = at high speed.=A0=A0 Worked great for takeoff & climb but area near hub= was stalled and draggy at cruise & high speed.

Works better on canards because that area is in turbulent air anyway.
Tracy


On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Samuel = Treffinger <samuel.treffinger@gmail.com> wrote:
Tracy, do you know of any negative side= affects of using a IVO magnum inflight adjustable prop with your psru?? I = think John Slade has that configuration, but I was wondering if you reccomm= ended it, or reccommended against it.
=A0
Sam


--20cf303f63725fa6ce04a98ca5ae--