X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTPS id 5070242 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:40:54 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=samuel.treffinger@gmail.com Received: by iyh42 with SMTP id 42so8722123iyh.25 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 07:40:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=tkvNqqDpQhTXGeLI369NyFYqgS2hM1mTsZV/srcph6c=; b=PngzX4pyNXA7Q4l22jAgh7jelaLAY7neQBY4lHohRFtWccH/4Z4hTi/v/hWJhKdE9E DSLkZ15yzMATnXu3vB8e/pEpyhm0Hrw6Rbory5QqVyrZI1QNO4WxsHJLh8xcRceRrbBg Oe1a465fzil8YahJefyOUzy7ri0oQZDssEW38= Received: by 10.231.112.150 with SMTP id w22mr3079970ibp.61.1312209618578; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 07:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.2.4] ([98.156.3.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2sm3404030ibd.22.2011.08.01.07.40.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 07:40:17 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-1042450532 Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8L1) From: Samuel Treffinger Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:40:12 -0500 To: Rotary motors in aircraft --Apple-Mail-4-1042450532 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii =46rom rotary and cozy legend John Slade: "I've heard a few people complain about cracks near the hub, but I've had no= problems in 80 hrs of use. Changing from a big fixed pitch prop to the IVO i= ncreased take-off and climb performance dramatically. I don't see any differ= ence at cruise. The prop is well made, and their service is excellent." Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Tracy wrote: > No negative effects that I know of. I used one for awhile on my RV-4 but= was not happy with it's efficiency at high speed. Worked great for takeof= f & climb but area near hub was stalled and draggy at cruise & high speed. >=20 > Works better on canards because that area is in turbulent air anyway. >=20 > Tracy >=20 > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Samuel Treffinger wrote: > Tracy, do you know of any negative side affects of using a IVO magnum infl= ight adjustable prop with your psru?? I think John Slade has that configurat= ion, but I was wondering if you reccommended it, or reccommended against it.= > =20 > Sam >=20 --Apple-Mail-4-1042450532 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
=46rom rotary and cozy legend John Slad= e:


<= span>"I've heard a few people complain about cracks near the hub, but I've h= ad no problems in 80 hrs of use. Changing from a big fixed pitch prop to the= IVO increased take-off and climb performance dramatically. I don't see any d= ifference at cruise. The prop is well made, and their service is excellent."=

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 1, 201= 1, at 6:57 AM, Tracy <rwstracy@gmai= l.com> wrote:

= No negative effects that I know of.   I used one for awhile on my R= V-4 but was not happy with it's efficiency at high speed.   Worked= great for takeoff & climb but area near hub was stalled and draggy at c= ruise & high speed.

Works better on canards because that area is in turbulent air anyway.
Tracy

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:48 AM,= Samuel Treffinger <samuel.treffinger= @gmail.com> wrote:
Tracy, do you know of any negative side a= ffects of using a IVO magnum inflight adjustable prop with your psru?? I thi= nk John Slade has that configuration, but I was wondering if you reccommende= d it, or reccommended against it.
 
Sam

= --Apple-Mail-4-1042450532--